The Oracle Sponge

Oracle Data Warehouse Design and Architecture

An Empassioned and Meaningless Debate

Posted by David Aldridge on 2008-04-25

“See-qwel” or “S-Q-L”? Have your say on this highly important matter here, and help shape the future of our industry.

11 Responses to “An Empassioned and Meaningless Debate”

  1. Tim Hall said

    The children! Won’t somebody think of the children!?

  2. EJ said

    Obviously, the correct answer is “squeal”

  3. Kevin said

    see-qwel

  4. Well, go to the creator.

    Ted called it S-Q-L, so help me Codd . . . . .

  5. Just wait till they get onto Bee-lobs.

  6. carlosal said

    ‘Ese-Ku-Ele’ (in spanish) ;)

    Cheers.

    Carlos.

  7. Brian Tkatch said

    I use SQL because the predecessor was SEQUEL “Structured English QUEry Language”. Strangley enough, IBM’s documentation uses “an SQL”, showing how they pronounce it.

  8. Anne Onimos said

    “suckle”

  9. David Weigel said

    I’m pretty schizoid about it. “sequel server”, “s-q-l plus”, “sequel developer”, “s-q-l” (alone), “sql worksheet”.

  10. Grebo said

    I have always called it SQrL (as in the animal that eats nuts)

  11. Anonymous said

    Tg\he origin os Sequel dates back ro IBM’s System R. A language names Sequel was chosen and later re-named SQL, hence the carry over.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>